e their followers to respect and admire them.

Transformational leaders influence their followers by intellectually stimulating them to become aware of problems in their groups and Organisation and view their problems from a new perspective - one consistent with the leaders vision. A transformational leader causes followers to view problems differently and feel some degree of responsibility for helping to solve them.

LEADERS: BORN OR MADE

When things go wrong in an Organisation, blame is most often laid at the leader's door. Colby Chandler, a past CEO of Kodak Corporation, for example is commonly thought to be responsible for many of Kodak's trouble in 1980s. Likewise, Ken Olsen, the founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, has been blamed for the troubles that have caused that company's earning to plummet and many of its employees to be laid off. Similarly, when organisations are doing particularly well, people tend to think that their leaders are doing an especially good job. A classic example of this penetration was the stunning turnaround of Chrysler Corporation in the 1980s, attributed to CEO Lee Iacocca. More recent examples come from Sony Corporation's success under the direction of Akio Morita and Microsoft's achievements under Bill Gates. Because leaders are thought to affect organisational performance, when an Organisation like IBM runs into trouble, a new leader like Lou Gerstner is often brought to turn the Organisation around.

In addition to being held responsible for the success or failure of whole Organisation, leaders are also held responsible for the performance of the individuals and groups within an organisation. The leadership capabilities of the manager of a group of car sales people may be questioned when the group's annual sales performance becomes the lowest in a geographic region, for example. Similarly the high sales performance of another group may be attributed to the exceptional leadership provided by the group's manager.

The common belief that leaders " make a difference" and can have a major impact on individuals, groups and whole organisations has promoted organisational behavior researchers to devote considerable effort to understanding leadership.

Researchers have focused primarily on two leadership issues:
(1) why some members of an organisation become leaders while others do not and
(2) why some leaders are more effective or successful than others.

In general, research confirms the popular belief that leadership is indeed an important ingredient of individual, group and organisational effectiveness. Good leaders spur on individuals, groups and whole organisations to perform at a high level and achieve their goals. Conversely, a lack of effective leadership is often a contributing factor to lackluster performance.

   Career Hub
Ten Things Not to Say When Firing an Employee
Letting talented employees go is further...

7 Things Not to Say When Asking for a Raise
Here are the lines that you would like to say...

Better Referrals from Employees or LinkedIn Contacts?
Employee referrals: You love them, can't live...

The most important factor in deciding to stay or leave a job
There are hundreds of reasons to decide to...

Why you need to be likable at work — but not nice
The workplace, we know, is social, not just...
 
Transformational Leadership
clear
clear
 Careerindia –> Careerhub –> Work Place Watch –> In Good Company

Transformational Leadership   
Transformational leadership inspires followers to trust the leader, perform behaviour that contribute to the achievement of organisational goals, and perform at a high level. Transformational leadership occurs when a leader transforms, or changes, his or her followers, in three important ways that together result in followers trusting the leader, performing behaviours that contribute to the achievement or organisational goals, and being motivated to perform at a high level:

1. Transformational leaders increase subordinates awareness of the importance of their tasks and the importance of performing them well.

2. Transformational leaders make subordinates aware of their needs for personal growth, development and accomplishment.

3. Transformational leaders motivate their subordinates to work for the good of the organisation rather than exclusively for their own personal gain or benefit.

Transformational leaders are charismatic leaders. They have vision of how good things could be in an Organisation that contrasts with how things currently are. Charismatic leaders clearly communicate this vision to their followers and, through their own excitement and enthusiasm, induce their followers to enthusiastically support his vision. Charismatic leaders tend to have high levels of self-confidence and self-esteem, which further encourage their followers to respect and admire them.

Transformational leaders influence their followers by intellectually stimulating them to become aware of problems in their groups and Organisation and view their problems from a new perspective - one consistent with the leaders vision. A transformational leader causes followers to view problems differently and feel some degree of responsibility for helping to solve them.

LEADERS: BORN OR MADE

When things go wrong in an Organisation, blame is most often laid at the leader's door. Colby Chandler, a past CEO of Kodak Corporation, for example is commonly thought to be responsible for many of Kodak's trouble in 1980s. Likewise, Ken Olsen, the founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, has been blamed for the troubles that have caused that company's earning to plummet and many of its employees to be laid off. Similarly, when organisations are doing particularly well, people tend to think that their leaders are doing an especially good job. A classic example of this penetration was the stunning turnaround of Chrysler Corporation in the 1980s, attributed to CEO Lee Iacocca. More recent examples come from Sony Corporation's success under the direction of Akio Morita and Microsoft's achievements under Bill Gates. Because leaders are thought to affect organisational performance, when an Organisation like IBM runs into trouble, a new leader like Lou Gerstner is often brought to turn the Organisation around.

In addition to being held responsible for the success or failure of whole Organisation, leaders are also held responsible for the performance of the individuals and groups within an organisation. The leadership capabilities of the manager of a group of car sales people may be questioned when the group's annual sales performance becomes the lowest in a geographic region, for example. Similarly the high sales performance of another group may be attributed to the exceptional leadership provided by the group's manager.

The common belief that leaders " make a difference" and can have a major impact on individuals, groups and whole organisations has promoted organisational behavior researchers to devote considerable effort to understanding leadership.

Researchers have focused primarily on two leadership issues:
(1) why some members of an organisation become leaders while others do not and
(2) why some leaders are more effective or successful than others.

In general, research confirms the popular belief that leadership is indeed an important ingredient of individual, group and organisational effectiveness. Good leaders spur on individuals, groups and whole organisations to perform at a high level and achieve their goals. Conversely, a lack of effective leadership is often a contributing factor to lackluster performance.

   Career Hub
Ten Things Not to Say When Firing an Employee
Letting talented employees go is further...

7 Things Not to Say When Asking for a Raise
Here are the lines that you would like to say...

Better Referrals from Employees or LinkedIn Contacts?
Employee referrals: You love them, can't live...

The most important factor in deciding to stay or leave a job
There are hundreds of reasons to decide to...

Why you need to be likable at work — but not nice
The workplace, we know, is social, not just...